Read the full judgment text of FCMC 9488/2020 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 18 May 2022 before 陳振國法官.
Matrimonial proceedings – Ancillary relief – Appeal permission – District Court Ordinance (Cap 336) s.63A(2) – Absence from trial – Pension – Family assets – Costs – Respondent applied for appeal permission against ancillary relief order made in his absence. Court considered whether there was a reasonable chance of success. Held: No reasonable chance; absence due to lack of time not valid excuse; pension part of family assets in 20-year marriage. Appeal permission refused; costs awarded to Petitioner.
Legal issues: 上訴許可申請 · 缺席審訊理由 · 退休金及家庭資產
Outcome: Appeal permission refused; summons withdrawn.
Cited by 1 case