Thapa Hari Bahadur v. Paramount Engineering & Manpower Service Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of CACV 98/2022 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 October 2022.

1.  Front Page, the name of the 1 st Defendant “PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING & MANPOWER” should read “PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING & MANPOWER SERVICE LIMITED ”.

Cited by 6 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 98/2022[2022] HKCA 1516
Court
Court of Appeal
Date14 Oct 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 98/2022

[2022] HKCA 1516

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 98 OF 2022

(ON APPEAL FROM HCPI NO 408 OF 2016)

_______________

BETWEEN

  THAPA HARI BAHADUR Plaintiff
  and  
  PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING & MANPOWER SERVICE LIMITED 1st Defendant
  MAEDA-CHINA STATE JOINT VENTURE 2nd Defendant

_______________

Before:  Hon Au and Chow JJA in Court

Date of Decision:  14 October 2022

Date of Corrigendum:  28 November 2022

___________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

___________________________

Please note that the following corrigendum for the Decision dated 14th day of October 2022:

1.  Front Page, the name of the 1st Defendant “PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING & MANPOWER” should read “PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING & MANPOWER SERVICE LIMITED”.

  (Yolanda Chan)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 98/2022