China Citic Bank International Ltd v. Cheuk Shuk Hing and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1447/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 December 2022.

1.  Page 5, line T, “Tideway Technology Limited” should read “Timeway Technology Limited”

Cited by 6 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1447/2019[2022] HKCFI 3646
Court
High Court CFI
Date06 Dec 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1447/2019

[2022] HKCFI 3646

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1447 OF 2019

________________________

BETWEEN

  CHINA CITIC BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Plaintiff
  and  
  CHEUK SHUK HING 1st Defendant
  SMART TIDE LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  TIMEWAY TECHNOLOGY LIMITED 3rd Defendant
  LI HIU YUNG 4th Defendant
  TIMEWAY INNOVATION LIMITED 5th Defendant

(BY ORIGINAL CLAIM)

AND BETWEEN

  CHEUK SHUK HING Plaintiff
  and  
  LI HIU YUNG 1st Defendant
  CHINA CITIC BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 2nd Defendant

(BY COUNTERCLAIM)

________________________

Before:  Mr. Recorder Manzoni SC in Court

Date of Judgment:  6 December 2022

Date of Corrigendum:  12 December 2022

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 12 December 2022:

1.  Page 5, line T, “Tideway Technology Limited” should read “Timeway Technology Limited”

2.  Page 6, line E and F-G, “Tideway Technology Limited” should read “Timeway Technology Limited”

  (Inti Tung)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1447/2019