HKSAR v. Chow Hang Tung

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 51/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 January 2023.

1.  Page 3, Line F: “…. the court should take in considering a defendants’ challenge ….” should read as “the court should take in considering a defendant’s challenge …”;

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMA 51/2022[2023] HKCFI 226
Court
High Court CFI
Date19 Jan 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA 51/2022

[2023] HKCFI 226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 51 OF 2022

(ON APPEAL FROM WKCC 2595 OF 2021)

________________

  IN THE MATTER OF an application for a certificate pursuant to Section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484
and
  IN THE MATTER OF the decision of the Court of First Instance of the 14th day of December 2022 in Magistracy Appeal No. 51 of 2022

________________

BETWEEN    
  HKSAR Respondent
     and  
    CHOW Hang-tung (鄒幸彤)    Appellant

____________________

Before:  Hon Barnes J in Court

Date of Hearing:  19 January 2023

Date of Decision:  19 January 2023

Date of Corrigendum:  31 January 2023

_________________

CORRIGENDUM

_________________

Please note the following amendments in the Decision dated 19 January 2023

1.  Page 3, Line F: “…. the court should take in considering a defendants’ challenge ….” should read as “the court should take in considering a defendant’s challenge …”;

2.  Page 3, Line M: “… Mr. Lau Wan Cheung, Edward, Acting Senior Public Prosecutor …” should read as “… Mr. Lau Wan Cheung, Edward, Senior Public Prosecutor …”.

Date the 31st day of January 2023

  (SUNANDA)
Clerk to Hon Barnes J