HKSAR v. Chen Keen (Alias Jack Chen) and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCCC 309/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 March 2023.
1. In paragraph 17 on page 10, lines G - H, “ They ended once the SEHK have completed their enquiries” should read “ They ended once the SEHK had completed their enquiries ”.
Cites 3 cases
|
HCCC 309/2019 [2023] HKCFI 1670 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CRIMINAL CASE NO 309 OF 2019 ________________________
________________________
________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Ruling [2023] HKCFI 1683 dated 23 June 2023: 1.In paragraph 17 on page 10, lines G - H, “ They ended once the SEHK have completed their enquiries” should read “ They ended once the SEHK had completed their enquiries”. 2.In paragraph 17 on page 10, lines Q - R, “ Stage 2 was the publication in the circular ” should read “ Stage 2 was the publication of the circular”. 3.In paragraph 32 on page 16, lines Q - S, “ complete misunderstanding of the corporate fundamental ” should read “ complete misunderstanding of the fundamental”. 4.In paragraph 38 on page 18, lines F - G, “ based on th e evidence ” should read “ based on the evidence”. Dated the 29th day of June 2023
[Subject to Reporting Restrictions as per Paragraph 43 of this judgment] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCCC 309/2019