HKSAR v. Chen Keen (Alias Jack Chen) and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCCC 309/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 March 2023.
1. In paragraph 21 on page 17, lines J - K, “ The defence were contended with this arrangement. ” should read “ The defence were contented with this arrangement.”.
Cites 2 cases
|
HCCC 309/2019 [2023] HKCFI 1719 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CRIMINAL CASE NO 309 OF 2019 ________________________
________________________
____________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ____________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Decision [2023] HKCFI 1719 dated 29 June 2023: 1.In paragraph 21 on page 17, lines J - K, “ The defence were contended with this arrangement. ” should read “ The defence were contented with this arrangement.”. 2.In paragraph 24 on page 18, lines D - F, “ in direct conflict with the documents ” should read “ in direct conflict with the Documents ”. 3.In paragraph 26 on page 18, lines P - Q, “ I am satisfied that this is not a case in which a fair trial would not be possible. ” should read “ I was satisfied that this was not a case in which a fair trial would not be possible. ”. 4.In paragraph 27 on page 19, lines B - D, “ The only part of this judgment which may be reported publicly are the above Conclusions. ” should read “ The only part of this judgment which may be reported publicly is the above Conclusion. ”. Dated the 7th day of July 2023
[Subject to Reporting Restrictions as per Paragraph 27 of this judgment] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCCC 309/2019