Sandhu Harpreet Singh (Formerly Known As Harpreet-singh) v. Lou Sai Tong
Read the full judgment text of DCPI 390/2020 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 26 March 2024.
1. At line N on page 3 (paragraph 6) the word " was” should read as " were ", and the word " Defendant's " should read as " Plaintiff’s ".
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
DCPI 390/2020 [2024] HKDC 469 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 390 OF 2020 ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 26 March 2024:- 1.At line N on page 3 (paragraph 6) the word "was” should read as "were", and the word "Defendant's" should read as "Plaintiff’s". 2.At line L-M on page 4 (paragraph 9), the word "Plaintiff" should read as "Defendant", and the word "Defendant's" and should read as " Plaintiff's" 3.At line J on page 8 (paragraph 19(1)), the word "Plaintiff" should read as "Defendant". 4.At line Q of page 11 (paragraph 19(6)), the word "Defendant's" should read as "Plaintiff’s". 5.At line Q of page 13 (paragraph 20(6)), the word “Defendant’s” should read as "Plaintiff’s". 6.At line C-D of page 15 (paragraph 20(10)), the word “Defendant” should read as "Plaintiff", and the word “Plaintiff’s” should read as "Defendant’s". 7.At line E of page 15 (paragraph 20(10)), the word “Defendant” should read as "Plaintiff". 8.At line S of page 15 (paragraph 20(11), the word “Defendant” should read as "Plaintiff".
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCPI 390/2020