HKSAR v. Tse Ki Chung

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 233/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 July 2023.

1. Page 10, footnote 10, “該案判詞第184頁第30行” should read“該案判詞在彙報第184頁第30行”.

Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMA 233/2022[2023] HKCFI 1756
Court
High Court CFI
Date07 Jul 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

[English Translation – 英譯本]

HCMA 233/2022

[2023] HKCFI 1756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 233 OF 2022

(ON APPEAL FROM TMCC 532/2021)

_____________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and  
  TSE KI-CHUNG (謝其聰) Appellant

_____________

Before: Hon Barnes J in Court
Date of Hearing: 16 June 2023
Date of Judgment: 7 July 2023
Date of Corrigenda: 2 July 2024

CORRIGENDA

Please note the following corrigenda in the judgment handed down by the Hon Barnes J on 7 July 2023: 

1.Page 10, footnote 10, “該案判詞第184頁第30行” should read“該案判詞在彙報第184頁第30行”.

2.Page 12, footnote 12,“第31頁”should read “第31段”.

3.Page 24, line A,“書面陳詞”should read “書面紀錄”.

4.Page 29, line O,“那一個警署”should read “哪一個警署”.

  (SUNANDA)
Clerk to Hon Barnes J