Read the full judgment text of FCMC 10285/2022 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 30 April 2025 before 區域法院暫委法官李家樂.
Child support – Leave to appeal – District Court Ordinance s.63A(2) – Debt – New partner – Self-represented – Whether the Judge failed to clarify the Father's debts and expenditure – Whether the Judge failed to consider the Mother's debts and the economic situation/future work capacity of new partners – Whether the Judge failed to consider the child's eye condition and the Father's debt repayment schedule – No reasonable prospect of success for all grounds – Application for leave to appeal refused. No order as to costs.
Legal issues: Whether the Judge failed to clarify the Father's debts and expenditure · Whether the Judge failed to consider the Mother's debts and the economic situation/future work capacity of new partners · Whether the Judge failed to consider the child's eye condition and the Father's debt repayment schedule
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal refused.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case