Bansal Manoj v. Director of Immigration and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 601/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 August 2025.

1. The Form 86 be amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the 2 nd Putative Respondent in place of “The Adjudicator of the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition office appointed to determine the Applicant’s Petition”, and naming the Director of Immigration as the Putative Interested Party;”

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 601/2020[2025] HKCFI 3665
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Aug 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 601/2020

[2025] HKCFI 3665

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 601 OF 2020

_____________

BETWEEN    
BANSAL MANOJ Applicant
and
Director of Immigration Putative 1st Respondent
and
Torture Claims Appeal Board /
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative 2nd Respondent
and
Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party

_____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge (Non-Refoulement Claims) YW Hew in Court
Date of Form CALL-1: 21 August 2025
Date of Corrigendum: 27 August 2025

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

Please note the following correction(s) in the Form CALL-1 dated 21 August 2025:

Page 1, “Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1. The Form 86 be amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the 2nd Putative Respondent in place of “The Adjudicator of the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition office appointed to determine the Applicant’s Petition”, and naming the Director of Immigration as the Putative Interested Party;”

should read

“Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1. The Form 86 be amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative 2nd Respondent in place of “The Adjudicator of the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition office appointed to determine the Applicant’s Petition”, and naming the Director of Immigration as the Putative Interested Party;”

References thereunder to “1st Putative Respondent” should read “Putative 1st Respondent”.

References thereunder to “2nd Putative Respondent” should read “Putative 2nd Respondent”.

  (Teresa Ng)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge (Non-Refoulement Claims)
  YW Hew