Hung Fat Cleaning Transportation Co Ltd and Another v. Telford Environmental Development Ltd and Others

Case No.HCA 2387/2019[2025] HKCFI 3161

Court

High Court CFI

Date25 Jul 2025

Judge—

Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCA 2387/2019 and HCA 820/2021 (Consolidated)

HCA 973/2020 (Heard together)

[2025] HKCFI 3161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2387 OF 2019

___________

BETWEEN

	HUNG FAT CLEANING TRANSPORTATION CO LTD	1^st Plaintiff
	ISS FACILITY SERVICES LIMITED	2^nd Plaintiff
	and
	TELFORD ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT LTD	1^st Defendant
	WORLD CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT LTD	2^nd Defendant
	LAU WAI HUNG	3^rd Defendant

________________________

(By Original Action)

AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 820 OF 2021

________________________

BETWEEN

	LAU WAI HUNG	Plaintiff
	and
	ISS FACILITY SERVICES LIMITED	1^st Defendant
	TELFORD ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT LTD	2^nd Defendant
	WORLD CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT LTD	3^rd Defendant

________________________

(By Counterclaim)

(Consolidated pursuant to the Order of Master Phoebe Man dated 28 July 2021)

AND

HCA 973/2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 973 OF 2020

________________________

BETWEEN

	HUNG FAT CLEANING TRANSPORTATION CO LTD	1^st Plaintiff
	ISS FACILITY SERVICES LIMITED	2^nd Plaintiff
	and
	KWONG HING RENEWABLE RESOURCES LIMITED	1^st Defendant
	GOLDEN HOPE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED	2^nd Defendant
	LAU WAI HUNG	3^rd Defendant

________________________

(Heard Together)

Before:

Deputy High Court Judge Maria Yuen in Court

Dates of Hearing:	8-11, 14-16, and 25 April 2025
Date of Judgment:	25 July 2025
Date of Corrigendum:	14 October 2025

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

Please note that the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 25 July 2025:-

1.At page 55, paragraph 126.2 should read:

“§57A that “in light of the matters aforesaid, the 3^rd Defendant should be liable to the 1^st and 2^nd Plaintiffs on the basis of breaches of various duties [pleaded in §§58 - 60];”