Lai Zhang Xiao Zhu, The Executrix of the Estate of Chang Vivian Wei Chu, Deceased v. Cyber Gold & Silver Ltd
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 269/2019 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 28 November 2025.
1. Paragraph 30 on page 17 be amended as: -
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
DCCJ 269/2019 [2025] HKDC 2003 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO 269 OF 2019 ——————————
——————————
CORRIGENDUM Please note the following amendments in the Decision handed down on 28 November 2025:
“Applying the principles enunciated in paragraph 14 of Man On Sum (supra), these are clearly questions which might be relevant to whether it would be not be appropriate for the Court to direct an inquiry at this stage; and relate to issues concerning the extent of matters for which the defendant should make account.”
“In terms of the remedy for ‘tracing’, such order has in fact been granted in the 7/2/2024 Order, where the Defendant was ordered to produce an account of the Account Balance. The failure of the Defendant in producing an account does not automatically entail that the Sum still remains in the Account. In the absence of any evidence of the current balance of the Account (or the balance at any time since September 2018), the Court is unable to draw any assumptions one way or another, regardless of how robust the Court can or should be. This Court is also guided by the principles cited in Man On Sum (supra) at paragraph 11 that Order 43 is not the appropriate avenue for seeking answers to interrogatories, or specific discovery, or clarification of accounts already rendered.” Dated the 31st day of December 2025
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 269/2019