Rich Engineering Ltd v. Fire Service Installation Contractors Disciplinary Board

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 803/2024 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 January 2026.

1.  At page 19, paragraph 50, line 9, “90%” should read as “85%”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 803/2024[2026] HKCFI 35
Court
High Court CFI
Date07 Jan 2026
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 803/2024

[2026] HKCFI 35

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLEANOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 803 OF 2024

(on appeal from Fire Service Installation Contractors Disciplinary Board)

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of an appeal from the Fire Service Installation Contractors Disciplinary Board in respect of FSICDB20-20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Regulation 10(2)  and 12(1)  of the Fire Service (Installation Contractors)  Regulation (Cap 95A)

________________________

BETWEEN

  RICH ENGINEERING LIMITED
(富裕工程有限公司)
Appellant
  and  
  FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION
CONTRACTORS DISCIPLINARY BOARD
Respondent

________________________

Before:  Deputy High Court Judge Gary CC Lam in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Hearing:  10 December 2025
Date of Judgment:  7 January 2026
Date of Corrigendum:  27 January 2026

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________


Please note the following amendment in the Judgment dated 7 January 2026:-

1.  At page 19, paragraph 50, line 9, “90%” should read as “85%”.

(Leanne Cheung)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 803/2024