Arav v. Vp, Lj

CACV 246/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2010

(ON APPEAL FROM FCMC NO. 3230 OF 2007)

________________________

BETWEEN

________________________

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Page 11, Paragraph 37, line F should read as :-

“…I will immediately inform the Respondent and shall hold the same for the benefit of Sports Fashion Limited and account to Sports Fashion Limited and/her the Respondent for any such payments.”

Page 13, Paragraph 45, line D should read as :-

…the HK$32.5 million transferred to Fashion Concept.

Page 20, Paragraph 73, line D & E should read as:-

…which was made up of EUR2,374,150.51 owed by Fashion Concept to Sports Fashion . . .

Page 20, Paragraph 75, line M should read as:-

…apportionment of the assets in the proportions of 60:40 to the wife and the husband respectively,

Page 20, Paragraph 76, line T should read as:-

“. . .both parties’ behaviour at times to be questionable . . .”

Page 22, Paragraph 82, line K should read as:-

“. . .conducted their financial affairs on an arm’s length basis. . . .”

Page 22, Paragraph 84, line T should read as:-

“It is accepted that the parties conducted their financial relationship largely on a commercial basis and at arm’s length. . . .”

Dated this 25^th day of March 2026