Lee Kam Leung Patrick and Another v. The Appeal Tribunal (Buidlings)

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 456/2025 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 March 2026.

1. At page 25 between line K and L the words, “Also, the BAT was entirely transparent that”, should be read as “Also, the BA was entirely transparent that;

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 456/2025[2026] HKCFI 1529
Court
High Court CFI
Date26 Mar 2026
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 456/2025

[2026] HKCFI 1529

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 456 OF 2025

________________________

BETWEEN

  LEE KAM LEUNG PATRICK & YUEN MI LUEN Applicants
  and  
  THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL (BUILDINGS) Respondent
  and  
  BUILDING AUTHORITY Interested Party

________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Court
Date of Hearing: 12 March 2026
Date of Judgment: 26 March 2026
Date of Corrigendum: 1 April 2026

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 26 March 2026 -

1.At page 25 between line K and L the words, “Also, the BAT was entirely transparent that”, should be read as “Also, the BA was entirely transparent that;

2.At page 58 between line F and G the words, “However, first it can be noted that section 51 of the BA provides for a broad discretion as to costs”, should be read as “However, first it can be noted that section 51 of the BO provides for a broad discretion as to costs;

Dated the 1st day of April 2026

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court