Lee Kam Leung Patrick and Another v. The Appeal Tribunal (Buidlings)

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 456/2025 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 March 2026.

1. At page 26 between line N and O the words, “that the costs of the Primary Hearing”, should be read as “that the costs of the Preliminary Hearing;

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 456/2025[2026] HKCFI 1529
Court
High Court CFI
Date26 Mar 2026
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 456/2025

[2026] HKCFI 1529

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 456 OF 2025

________________________

BETWEEN

  LEE KAM LEUNG PATRICK & YUEN MI LUEN Applicants
  and  
  THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL (BUILDINGS) Respondent
  and  
  BUILDING AUTHORITY Interested Party

________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Court
Date of Hearing: 12 March 2026
Date of Judgment: 26 March 2026
Date of Corrigendum: 24 June 2026

__________________

2ND CORRIGENDUM

__________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 26 March 2026 -

1.At page 26 between line N and O the words, “that the costs of the Primary Hearing”, should be read as “that the costs of the Preliminary Hearing;

2.At page 26 between line Q and R the words, “Thirdly, the Primary Hearing included dealing with the Applicants’ FBP Request”, should be read as “Thirdly, the Preliminary Hearing included dealing with the Applicants’ FBP Request;

3.At page 27 between line F and G the words, “Fifthly, logically the costs of dealing with those two issues at both the Primary Hearing”, should be read as “Fifthly, logically the costs of dealing with those two issues at both the Preliminary Hearing;

Dated the 24th day of June 2026

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court