Read the full judgment text of CACC 000213/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 7 November 2001.
1. The Applicant originally applied for an extension of time for leave to appeal against sentences imposed on him in two cases. Today, we are told that he abandons the application in respect of one case, which is CACC No. 214/2001, but prosecutes his appeal in respect of CACC No. 213 of 2001, in which he is represented by Mr Bernard Yuen of counsel. It is, however, necessary for us in this judgment to refer to the facts of the two cases that gave rise to both applications.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 4 cases