Read the full judgment text of DCPI 000329/2002 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 22 September 2003.
1. She sued the defendant for damages for breach of the common duty of care stipulated in the Occupier's Liability Ordinance, Cap. 314 or for negligence or both. The particulars of negligence as pleaded were: causing or permitting the toilet floor to become or remain wet and slippery state; failing to place any or any adequate warning sign in the wet and slippery areas of the toilet; failing to warn the plaintiff that the floor was slippery and dangerous.
Cited by 8 cases · Cites 5 cases