Read the full judgment text of HCCW 594/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 August 2003.
1. There are before the court three summonses (“the three Summonses”) issued by the 1 st , 6 th and 7 th respondents in HCCW594/1999 (“the Winding‑Up Petition”), the 2 nd , 6 th and 7 th defendants in HCA1240/2001 (“the Interstitial Action”) and the 2 nd and 5 th defendants in HCA4225/2001 (“the BPR Action”), each applying for an order under Order 4, rule 9, Rules of the High Court that the three actions be tried together or one after another. The summonses were previously adjourned at the requ
Cites 2 cases