Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001033/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 April 2004.
1. The Appellant in his case appeals against his conviction. He was convicted after trial of one charge of theft. The evidence at the trial was given by a total of five witnesses. It is the prosecution's case that on the 6th April 2003 at about 4:30 pm, the staff of a company called Access Technology in Room 1007 of Windsor House had become aware of the fact that the property, listed in the charge, had been stolen so they subsequently watched the security video and saw the theft and also had a g
Cited by 1 case