Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000342/2001 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 9 June 2004.
1. The applicant claimed compensation from the 2nd and 3rd respondents under sections 9, 10 and 10A of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance. The section 10A claim was abandoned. Following the trial I gave judgment in favour of the applicant against both respondents for $197,184.00 with interest and costs and ordered that the 2nd defendant under section 24 of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance indemnify the 3rd respondent for any sums paid by it to the applicant in satisfaction of the judgmen
Cited by 2 cases