Commissioner of Registration v. Registration Opersons Tribunal and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 176/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 September 2003.

1. On the 1st line of paragraph 38(4), "The applicant......" should read "The 2nd respondent......".

Case No.HCAL 176/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Sep 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL000176M/2002

HCAL176/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO.176 OF 2002

--------------------------------

BETWEEN
COMMISSIONER OF REGISTRATION Applicant
AND
REGISTRATION OPERSONS TRIBUNAL 1st Respondent

WONG HI KWONG

2nd Respondent

-------------------------------

Coram: Hon Chu J in Court

Date of Hearing : 13 February 2003

Date of Judgment : 3 September 2003

--------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

--------------------------------

1. On the 1st line of paragraph 38(4), "The applicant......" should read "The 2nd respondent......".

Rebecca Lai (Ms)
Clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice Chu
11 September 2003