Re Yu Man
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 20 December 2004.
1. The sentence “it was varied by his order of 21 March 2004 .” as shown on line C-D, paragraph 3 on page 2 should read “it was varied by his order of 21 March 2003 . ”.
|
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO.380 OF 2003 (on appeal from HCB No. 14971 of 2003) __________________ In Re : YU MAN ex p. CHAN BING FOON __________________ Before : Hon Woo VP, Yeung and Yuen JJA in Court Date of Hearing and Judgment : 9 December 2004 Date of Reasons for Judgment : 20 December 2004 ---------------------------------------------- C O R R I G E N D U M ----------------------------------------------- 1.The sentence “it was varied by his order of 21 March 2004.” as shown on line C-D, paragraph 3 on page 2 should read “it was varied by his order of 21 March 2003. ”. 2.The sentence “it is incumbent upon the solicitors acting for him to refer to the varied order of 21 March 2004.” as shown on line G, paragraph 4 on page 2, should read “it is incumbent upon the solicitors acting for him to refer to the varied order of 21 March 2003.”. Dated the 24th day of January 2005.
|