Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000012/2005 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 26 April 2005.
1. In addition to the argument advanced on behalf of both applicants by Mr Andrew Bruce SC for the first and Mr Michael Blanchflower SC for the second, there are two arguments advanced by Mr Blanchflower for the second alone. The first of these arguments for the 2 nd applicant alone is that Her Honour Judge Chua erred in how she treated his decision not to testify. And the second one is that she erred in her treatment of the evidence relevant to the drawing of inferences. Despite the skill wi