Read the full judgment text of CACV 000205/2003 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 10 July 2006.
1. I have had the benefit of reading in draft the judgment of Tang JA and I agree with the views he has expressed and the orders he has proposed. As the Labour Tribunal Presiding Officer considered that he was bound by the dictum in David Hot Blocking Press Ltd v Ho King Yam [1996] 1 HKC 270, he did not examine the evidence to determine (a) whether the claimants’ evidence (that they had in fact worked throughout the “break” between written contracts) should be accepted, or (b) if he did not acc
Cites 1 case