Siegfried Adalbert Unruh v. Hans-joerg Seeberger and Another
Read the full judgment text of FACV 9/2006 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 9 February 2007.
1. Paragraph 95, lines 2-3: should read “Article 35 of the Basic Law”.
|
FACV Nos. 9 & 10 of 2006 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NOs. 9 & 10 OF 2006 (Civil) (ON APPEAL FROM CACV Nos. 297 & 298 of 2004) _______________________ Between:
_______________________ Court: Chief Justice Li , Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice McHugh NPJ Dates of Hearing: 15, 16 and 18 January 2007 Date of Judgment: 9 February 2007 _______________________ CORRIGENDA _______________________ 1.Paragraph 95, lines 2-3: should read “Article 35 of the Basic Law”. 2.Paragraph 146, line 6: should read “(where A assigned the lease to C)”. 3.Paragraph 146, lines 11-12: should read “if it had not entered into the transaction”. Dated this 9th day of February 2007
|
Further hearings and rulings under FACV 9/2006