Read the full judgment text of HCPI 000588/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 March 2007.
1. I have before me two summonses. The first in time, which is one made under O.15 r.6 of the RHC, is one dated 30 March 2006 [52-54 Blue Bundle] taken out by the 3 rd Defendant to cease to be a party to the action. The later one, dated 18 January 2007, by the Plaintiff is in the form of a Notice of Appeal against so much of a decision of Master Au-Yeung which required the Plaintiff to pay the 3 rd Defendant’s costs on the Plaintiff’s summons to extend the validity of the writ in the action.
Cites 1 case