Waan Chuen Ming v. Lo Kin Nam t/a Kar Kin Engineering & Supplier Co and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCPI 588/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 July 2008.
1. Paragraph 1, line S should read “2 nd defendant’s factory” instead of “1 st defendant’s factory”;
Cites 1 case
|
HCPI 588/2003 and HCPI 591/2003 (consolidated) IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 588 OF 2003 and NO 591 OF 2003 ---------------------- BETWEEN
---------------------- (Consolidated by the Order of Before : Hon Suffiad J in Court Dates of Hearing : 23-25 June 2008 Date of Judgment : 21 July 2008 _______________ CORRIGENDA _______________ 1.Paragraph 1, line S should read “2nd defendant’s factory” instead of “1st defendant’s factory”; 2.Paragraph 135, the Loss of earnings (pre-trial) should read “1,230,350” instead of “931,350”; and the Total should read “$2,868,786” instead of “$2,569,786”; 3.Paragraph 136 should read “There will be judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendant in the sum of $2,868,786.00” instead of “There will be judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendant in the sum of $2,569,786.00” Dated this 25th day of February 2009
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 588/2003