Waan Chuen Ming v. Lo Kin Nam t/a Kar Kin Engineering & Supplier Co and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 588/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 July 2008.

1. Paragraph 1, line S should read “2 nd defendant’s factory” instead of “1 st defendant’s factory”;

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 588/2003
Court
High Court CFI
Date21 Jul 2008
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 588/2003 and HCPI 591/2003 (consolidated)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 588 OF 2003 and NO 591 OF 2003

----------------------

BETWEEN

  WAAN CHUEN MING Plaintiff
  and  
  LO KIN NAM trading as KAR KIN ENGINEERING & SUPPLIER CO. 1st Defendant
  LUEN HING FAT COATING & FINISHING FACTORY LIMITED 2nd Defendant

----------------------

(Consolidated by the Order of
Master B. Kwan dated 7th June 2004)

Before :  Hon Suffiad J in Court

Dates of Hearing :  23-25 June 2008

Date of Judgment :  21 July 2008

_______________

CORRIGENDA

_______________

1.Paragraph 1, line S should read “2nd defendant’s factory” instead of “1st defendant’s factory”;

2.Paragraph 135, the Loss of earnings (pre-trial) should read “1,230,350” instead of “931,350”; and the Total should read “$2,868,786” instead of “$2,569,786”;

3.Paragraph 136 should read “There will be judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendant in the sum of $2,868,786.00” instead of “There will be judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendant in the sum of $2,569,786.00”                                         

Dated this 25th day of February 2009

  (D. Chan ) (Ms)
  Clerk to The Hon. Suffiad J.