|
DCEC 153-4 & 241-6/2004
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 153 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
LI YUEN YAU acting for herself and other members of the family, namely, TSO HON YING and TSO CHING YI, of TSO PAK KUEN, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 154 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
LEE CHIU LAN acting for herself and other members of the family, namely, CHAN LORRAINE, CHAN KING FAI CHAN WAI YING, of CHAN SHING TONG, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 241 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of IGNATOVA LYUDMILA MIKHALOVNA acting herself and other members of the family of IGNATOV ALEKSANDR GRIGOREVICH, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 242 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of MIKHAYLISHINA OLESYA IGOREVNA acting herself and other members of the family of MIKHAYLISHIN ANATOLIY BOGDANOVICH, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 243 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of SHERSTYUK IRINA SERGEEVNA acting herself and other members of the family of SHERSTYUK PAVEL YURIVICH, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 244 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of STEPANOVA VALENTINA KONSTANTINOVNA acting herself and other members of the family of KUZNETSOV YURIY ANATOLEVICH, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 245 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of POZDNYAK OLGA LVOVNA acting herself and other members of the family of POZDNYAK NIKOLAY IVANOVICH, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 246 OF 2004
_______________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
| |
TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of TROFIMOVA OKSANA VLADIMIROVNA acting herself and other members of the family of TROFIMOV GERMAN EVGENEVICH, deceased |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED |
1st Respondent |
| |
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
________________
Coram: Deputy District Judge Anthony Kwok in Court
Date of Hearing: 19 January 2007
Date of Delivery of Judgment: 20 March 2007
CORRIGENDUM
Paragraph 22(a) on page 16 of the Judgment should read:
“TSO Pak- kuen (DCEC 153/2004) – Fitter (aged 59)
HK$14,000 x 36 months = HK$504,000.”
Paragraph 22(e) on page 17 of the Judgment should read:
“SHERSTYUK (DCEC 243/2004) – 3rd Officer (aged 25)
US$1,054.29 x 84 months = US$88,560.36”
Paragraph 22(h) on page 17 of the Judgment should read:
“TROFIMOV (DCEC 246/2004) – Cook (aged 36)
US$1,087.38 x 84 months = US$91,339.92”
Dated this 7th August 2007
| |
(Rachel HM Man)(Miss)
Clerk to Deputy Judge A. Kwok
|
|