Read the full judgment text of CACC 000413/2007 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 March 2008.
1. The 1 st applicant (“D1”) was convicted on his own plea before Judge Mackintosh in the District Court of two offences of wounding, contrary to section 19 of the offences against the Person Ordinance, Cap. 212 (being Charges 1 and 2). The judge also convicted, after trial, the 2 nd applicant (“D2”) of an offence of affray, contrary to Common Law (Charge 4). That charge was added by the judge, pursuant to section 23 of Cap. 221, at the close of the prosecution case. As far as D2 was concerne
Cited by 5 cases