Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000835/2007 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 23 April 2008.
1. The applicant applies for costs against the 1st respondent at the application to discontinue this action against the 1st respondent. The basis of the applicant’s application is that the applicant was led on by the 1st respondent’s letters before action and the answer filed to the application because the 1st respondent merely denied it was liable because the applicant was not injured in the course of employment when in fact the strongest defence for the 1st respondent is that the 1st responde