Read the full judgment text of CACC 111/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 25 July 2007.
1. The Applicant faced 5 charges, three of which (Charges 1, 2 and 4) were of unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16, contrary to section 124(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200, Laws of Hong Kong (“the Ordinance”); and the remaining two (Charges 3 and 5) were of buggery with a girl under 21, contrary to section 118D of the Ordinance.
Cites 1 case