Read the full judgment text of CACC 380/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 September 2007.
1. The three Applicants were all charged with one count of “theft” and one alternative count of “handling stolen goods”. The 1 st Applicant was also charged with one count of “assisting the passage within Hong Kong of an unauthorized entrant” (hereinafter “the immigration charge”). The 1 st Applicant pleaded guilty to “handling stolen goods” and the immigration charge, while the 2 nd and 3 rd Applicants denied all the charges. After trial, Deputy District Judge Sham convicted the 2 nd and 3 r
Cites 2 cases