PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE& CABLE COMPANY LIMITED v HARMUTTY LIMITED

Read the full judgment text of CACV 208/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 June 2009.

1. In this case, this Court has made clear that, quite apart from anything else, it does not consider that this matter was fit for Order 14.  So if one considers the criteria for granting leave in interlocutory appeals, I regret that whether or not there is a question of great general or public importance as regards whether the exact wording of Order 14 rule 1(2) and the exclusion of actions which include a claim by the Plaintiff based on an allegation of fraud and whether that means that an Ord

Cites 2 cases

Application for leave to appeal by the plaintiff dismissed by Court of Final Appeal. Please refer to FAMV28/2009 to FAMV33/2009 dated 14 September 2009
Case No.CACV 208/2008
Court
Court of Appeal
Date05 Jun 2009
PartiesPACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE& CABLE COMPANY LIMITED v HARMUTTY LIMITED