Read the full judgment text of CACV 000278/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 May 2010.
1. This is an appeal of the plaintiff from the decision of Suffiad J giving unconditional leave to the 4 th and 5 th defendants to defend the plaintiff’s claim arising out of separate deeds of guarantee they executed in its favour. The judge held there was a triable issue on the defence of undue influence. We dismissed the appeal at the conclusion of the hearing, and ordered that the costs of this appeal be the defendants’ costs in the cause of the action. These are the reasons for that judgment
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case