Read the full judgment text of FAMC 42/2010 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 13 July 2010.
1. The marriage concerned was a marriage in the eyes of the law. That was so even though the woman was paid to enter into it, even though no affection was involved and even though the parties had not the slightest intention of living together or behaving in any way like a married couple. Although the marriage was described in the charge as a “bogus marriage”, what was bogus was the application to the Immigration Department for the purposes of which the marriage was entered into. That application
Cited by 1 case