HKSAR v. Law Chun Ho
|
DCCC 541/2010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 541 OF 2010 ---------------------
---------------------
--------------------------- Reasons for Sentence --------------------------- Charge and facts 1.The Defendant pleads guilty to trafficking in a dangerous drug, namely 12.08 grammes of a solid containing 9.15 grammes of cocaine. On 8 March 2010, the police laid ambush at the staircase next to Room 203, Wang Chiu House, Wang Tau Hom Estate, Wong Tai Sin, Kowloon, Hong Kong. At about 9:50 p.m., the Defendant left his flat at Room 205 of Wang Chiu House. He kept looking around and back. The police intercepted him. Nothing illegal was found on him. 2.Acting upon a search warrant, the police searched his flat. They found under a pillow inside his bedroom a pink plastic bag which contained:
3.The police first arrested and cautioned him for possession of dangerous drugs, he said that he had no money, his parents had no jobs and so he sold cocaine. The police immediately arrested and cautioned him for trafficking in a dangerous drug. He said that all the drugs belonged to him and had nothing to do with his family. 4.Subsequently, in Wong Tai Sin Police Station, in a video-recorded interview under caution, he said that:
Personal background and mitigation put forward 5.He is now 18 years of age. He worked as a cable TV technician since March 2010. He had a clear record until he committed the offence of possession of a dangerous drug on 22 January 2010. He was charged on 2 March 2010 and granted court bail in Kwun Tong Magistracy on 5 March 2010. Three days later, he committed the present offence. His solicitor accepts such as an aggravating factor. 6.On 30 April 2010, he was sentenced to DATC in Kwun Tong Magistracy. His solicitor tells me that he has been clear of his drug dependence. Given his age, a training centre report may be appropriate. I understand that in appropriate though sparingly few cases, a training centre order may be imposed. I order such a report with a clear acknowledgment by the Defendant that the final sentence may be imprisonment even where a training centre order is recommended by the Correctional Services Department. 7.The training centre report lodged before me today indicates that he has remained a drug dependant. He is not suitable for detention in the training centre. Sentencing principles 8.There are sentencing guidelines for trafficking in cocaine. In Attorney General v Rojas [1994] 1 HKC 342, Silke VP equated the adverse psychotropic impact of cocaine with heroin. The sentencing guidelines in R v Lau Tak-ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370 were said to be directly applicable as follows:
Sentencing this Defendant 9.According to what he said upon caution, he had been selling cocaine since February. That means several weeks before his arrest. So far he had sold 35 bags of cocaine. There is the aggravating factor of his committing the present offence whilst on court bail for a related offence. I take 5 years as the starting point. I reduce it by one-third because of his plea of guilty. There is no other mitigation. His sentence is 3 years and 4 months.
|
Cases cited in this judgment