Wan v. Lai

Read the full judgment text of FCMC 11943/2003 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 15 February 2007 before Deputy District Judge Chan Chan-kok.

District Court – Matrimonial Cause No. 11943 of 2003 and Civil Action No. 5186 of 2005 heard together in Chambers – Judgment delivered 15 February 2007 – Corrigendum issued 8 September 2010 regarding paragraph 52(6) and 59

Cites 1 case

Case No.FCMC 11943/2003
Court
Family Court
Date15 Feb 2007
JudgeDeputy District Judge Chan Chan-kok
Case Document
100%Judiciary

[English Translation – 英譯本]
FCMC 11943/2003

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MATRIMONIAL CAUSES NO. 11943 OF 2003

________________________

BETWEEN

Wan Petitioner
and
Lai Respondent

________________________

DCCJ 5186/2005

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5186 OF 2005

________________________

BETWEEN

A Finance Company Plaintiff
(Judgment Creditor)
and
L Defendant
(Judgment Debtor)

________________________

(The two cases were heard together in Chambers pursuant
to the order made by Master Tracy Chan of the District Court on 20 March 2006)

Coram: Deputy District Judge Chan Chan-kok in Chambers (not open to public)

Dates of Hearing: 1, 13-15 September 2006, 14 November 2006 and 22 January 2007

Date of handing down Judgment:     15 February 2007

______________

CORRIGENDUM

______________

In paragraph 52(6) on page 28, “…According to the wife, the husband occasionally put cash of more than $100 into a tin can when he returned home after work.  If, therefore, he worked 25 days a month, the money he put there would not exceed $2,500…” should read “…According to the wife, the husband occasionally put cash of not more than $100 into a tin can when he returned home after work.  If, therefore, he worked 25 days a month, the money he put there would not exceed $2,500…”.

In paragraph 59 on page 33, “It is clear from the above clause that, upon purchasing the former matrimonial home, the husband and the wife as beneficial owners thereof charged the property (one indecipherable character) the mortgagee bank.” should read “It is clear from the above clause that, upon purchasing the former matrimonial home, the husband and the wife as beneficial owners thereof charged the property to the mortgagee bank”.   

(Ho Wing Shan)
Clerk to the Hon Judge Chan of the District Court
8 September 2010

Translated by the Judgment Translation Unit of the Judiciary