Wang Ruiyun v. Gem Global Yield Fund Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCCL 16/2006 on BabelCite. This HCCL judgment was delivered on 27 October 2010.
Cites 1 case
|
HCCL 16/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMMERCIAL ACTION NO. 16 OF 2006 ----------------------
Before: Hon Stone J in Chambers (Open to Public) Date of Hearing: 14 September 2010 Date of Judgment: 27 October 2010 ___________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ___________________________ In paragraph 12S, ‘defendant’ should be ‘plaintiff’; In paragraph 30I-J and K-L, ‘plaintiff’ should be ‘defendant’; In paragraphs 33K and 35S, ‘Mr Westwood’ should be ‘Mr Westbrook’; In paragraph 46S and T, ‘plaintiff’ should be ‘defendant’; In paragraph 48(i)M, delete ‘(being approximately 70% of the plaintiff’s net residual claim)’; In paragraph 48(iii)C-D, ‘plaintiff’ should be ‘defendant’. Dated this 10th day of November, 2010
| |||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCCL 16/2006