Re Wing Kai Investment Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 379/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 November 2010.

1. Whenever the name "Bo Kei" appears in the judgment should read "Po Kei".

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCW 379/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Nov 2010
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW 379/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 379 OF 2007

____________

 

IN THE MATTER of WING KAI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED (永佳置業有限公司)

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32

____________

And

HCMP 1590/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1590 OF 2006

___________

 

IN THE MATTER of WING KAI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED (永佳置業有限公司)

  and
 

IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32

____________

BETWEEN

  TAM PO KEI Petitioner
  and  
  TAM BO KIN (alias TAM PO KIN) 1st Respondent
  TAM YOU HAUP 2nd Respondent
  TAM CHUNG ON 3rd Respondent
  TAM LAI CHING 4th Respondent
  TAM MEE YING 5th Respondent
  WING KAI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
(永佳置業有限公司)
6th Respondent

____________

(Heard together)

Before: Hon Harris J in Court

Dates of Hearing: 18-22, 25-27, 29 January 2010

Date of Judgment: 11 November 2010

_________________

CORRIGENDA

_________________

1.Whenever the name "Bo Kei" appears in the judgment should read "Po Kei".

2.On (i) page 22, at para. 32, line J; (ii) page 23, at para. 35, line P; and (iii) page 54, at para. 96, line E where "Bo Kei's" should read "Bo Kin's".

3.On (i) page 11, at para. 12, line K; (ii) page 23, at para. 34, line L; (iii) page 63, at para.115, lines I and K, and (iv) page 66, at para. 123, lines P and S where "Bo Kin" should read "Po Kei".

4.On (i) page 33, at para. 58, line I; and (ii) page 38, para. 69, lines R and S and (iii) page 55, at para. 97, line I where "Bo Kei" should read "Bo Kin".

5.On page 63, at para. 115, line J "Bo Kin's" be amended to read "Po Kei's".

6.On page 36, at para. 66, line K, the last part of the sentence should read "I do not accept that it is."

7.On page 27, at para. 43(b), line G, add "payments" after the words "wrongfully cause".

8.On page 9, at (i) para. 9(1), line C “was payable but” should read “was payable to Po kei but”.

(Janice Li)
Clerk to Hon. Harris, J.
14 February 2011