Chan Chi Shing v. The Revising Officer Mr. Symon Wong

HCAL 132/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 132 OF 2010

____________

____________

HCAL 9/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 9 OF 2011

____________

Before: Hon Au J in Court

Date of Hearing: 11 March 2011, 1 April 2011

Date of Judgment: 27 April 2011

_______________

2^nd CORRIGENDUM

_______________

Paragraph 61 in page 32 should read as follows:

“61. The Revising Officer as the Respondent takes a neutral stance to the judicial review application, and so do the EAC and the Director (the 1^st and 2^nd Interested Parties), save that Mr Wong for them the 1^st and 2^nd Interested Parties has made helpful submissions regarding whether certain remedies could be granted as sought by the Applicant, something which I would discuss at the later part of the Judgment… ”

The representations stated at page 53 should read as follows:

“Mr. Ronny K.W. TONG, S.C., leading Mr. Anthony H.K. CHAN, instructed by Messrs Wong, Hui & Co., for the Applicant (HCAL132/2010) and the Petitioner (HCAL9/2011).

Mr. Stewart WONG, instructed by Department of Justice, for the Respondent and the 1st and 2nd Interested Parties (HCAL132/2010), with attendance excused at the hearing on 11 March 2011.

The Respondent (HCAL132/2010), represented by Department of Justice, with attendance excused at all the hearings.

Mr. Stephen L.W. TANG, instructed by Messrs Hastings & Co., assigned by Director of Legal Aid, for the 100th Interested Party (HCAL132/2010).

3rd to 118th Interested Parties, except the 100th Interested Party (HCAL132/2010), in person, absent.

陳觀華, the Respondent (HCAL9/2011), appearing in person. ”