Read the full judgment text of CACC 32/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 June 2011.
1. The applicant pleaded guilty to four charges in the District Court. The first and fourth charges were conspiracy to deal with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence (commonly known as “money laundering”), contrary to section 25(1) and (3) of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 455 and sections 159A and 159C of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200, Laws of Hong Kong. The second and third charges were dealing with property known or believed to represent
Cites 3 cases