HKSAR v. Lee Sze Lung
Read the full judgment text of CACC 16/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The Court has directed the parties to lodge written submissions on re-trial which they have now done. The respondent applies for a re-trial while the 1 st applicant opposes it.
Cites 1 case
|
CACC 16/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2010 (On Appeal From High Court Criminal Case No. 209 of 2009) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ Before : Hon Cheung, Yuen JJA and Line J in Court Date of Respondent’s Written Submission : 21 October 2011 Date of Respondent’s Amended Written Submission : 22 October 2011 Date of 1st Applicant’s Written Submission : 25 October 2011 Date of Judgment On Re-trial : 14 November 2011 ________________________ JUDGMENT ON RE-TRIAL ________________________ Hon Cheung JA (giving judgment of the Court) : 1.The Court has directed the parties to lodge written submissions on re-trial which they have now done. The respondent applies for a re-trial while the 1st applicant opposes it. 2.We have taken into regard the hardship that the 1st applicant will have to go through with a re-trial but having considered the seriousness of the offence and the fact that the conviction was quashed on the basis of matters relating to the direction to jury and counsel’s conduct at the trial, we are of the view that as a matter of public interest a re-trial is necessary and accordingly we will order a re-trial.
Mr. William Tam, Ag. DDPP of Department of Justice, for the Respondent Mr. Gerard McCoy SC and Mr. Daniel Hui, instructed by Messrs Tsang, Chan & Woo, for the 1st Applicant |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 16/2010