BabelCite

Pccw-hkt Telephone Ltd v. The Telecommunications Authority

Case No.CACV 108/2011
Court
Court of Appeal
Date29 Feb 2012
Judge—
Case Document
100%

CACV 108/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2011

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of an Application by PCCW-HKT Telephone Limited for an Order requiring that the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board do state a case for the opinion of the Court of Appeal

________________________

BETWEEN

  PCCW-HKT TELEPHONE LIMITED Applicant
  and
  THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Respondent

________________________

CACV 109/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 109 OF 2011

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board pursuant to Section 32N of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106)

BETWEEN

  THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (“TA”) Applicant
  and
  THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (COMPETITION PROVISIONS) APPEAL BOARD
 1st Respondent
  SMARTONE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (“SMARTONE”)
 2nd Respondent
  PCCW-HKT TELEPHONE LIMITED (“PCCW”) 3rd Respondent

________________________

CACV 110/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 110 OF 2011

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board pursuant to Section 32N of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106)

________________________

BETWEEN

  THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (“TA”) Applicant
  and
  THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (COMPETITION PROVISIONS) APPEAL BOARD
 1st Respondent
  PCCW-HKT TELEPHONE LIMITED (“PCCW”) 2nd Respondent

________________________

Before: Hon Tang VP and Fok JA in Court

Date of Hearing: 29 February 2012

Date of Judgment: 29 February 2012

Date of Handing Down Reasons for Judgment: 8 March 2012

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following amendment in the Reasons for Judgment handed down on 8 March 2012:

Paragraph 16 on page 8 line B:

“16 November 2011” should read “16 November 2010”.

Dated this 19th day of March 2012.

  (Phemie Chan)
  Clerk to Hon Fok JA

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 108/2011

Pccw-hkt Telephone Ltd v. The Telecommunications Authority
Court of Appeal
08 Mar 2012
Full analysis
The Telecommunications Authority (“Ta”) v. The Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board and Others
Court of Appeal
29 Feb 2012
The Telecommunications Authority (“Ta”) v. The Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board and Others
Court of Appeal
29 Feb 2012
The Telecommunications Authority (“Ta”) v. The Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board and Others
Court of Appeal
29 Feb 2012
Corrigendum
The Telecommunications Authority (“Ta”) v. The Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board and Another
Court of Appeal
29 Feb 2012
Corrigendum