|
CACV 108/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2011
________________________
| |
IN THE MATTER of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106) |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of an Application by PCCW-HKT Telephone Limited for an Order requiring that the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board do state a case for the opinion of the Court of Appeal |
________________________
BETWEEN
| |
PCCW-HKT TELEPHONE LIMITED |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY |
Respondent |
________________________
CACV 109/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 109 OF 2011
________________________
| |
IN THE MATTER of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106) |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board pursuant to Section 32N of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106) |
BETWEEN
| |
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (“TA”) |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (COMPETITION PROVISIONS) APPEAL BOARD
|
1st Respondent |
| |
SMARTONE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (“SMARTONE”)
|
2nd Respondent |
| |
PCCW-HKT TELEPHONE LIMITED (“PCCW”) |
3rd Respondent |
________________________
CACV 110/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 110 OF 2011
________________________
| |
IN THE MATTER of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106) |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board pursuant to Section 32N of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106) |
________________________
BETWEEN
| |
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (“TA”) |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (COMPETITION PROVISIONS) APPEAL BOARD
|
1st Respondent |
| |
PCCW-HKT TELEPHONE LIMITED (“PCCW”) |
2nd Respondent |
________________________
Before: Hon Tang VP and Fok JA in Court
Date of Hearing: 29 February 2012
Date of Judgment: 29 February 2012
Date of Handing Down Reasons for Judgment: 8 March 2012
________________________
C O R R I G E N D U M
________________________
Please note the following amendment in the Reasons for Judgment handed down on 8 March 2012:
Paragraph 16 on page 8 line B:
“16 November 2011” should read “16 November 2010”.
Dated this 19th day of March 2012.
| |
(Phemie Chan) |
| |
Clerk to Hon Fok JA |
|