Z v. X

Read the full judgment text of CACV 166/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 November 2012.

1.   Paragraph 4.5) should read as follow:

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 166/2011
Court
Court of Appeal
Date13 Nov 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 166/2011
CACV 251/2011
CACV 252/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 166, 251 & 252 OF 2011)

(On Appeal from HCMC No. 1 of 2007)

________________________

Z Petitioner
and
X Respondent
C Intervening Party

________________________

Before: Hon Cheung, Yuen and Chu JJA in Court
Dates of Hearing: 25-27 September 2012
Date of Judgment: 13 November 2012

________________________

CORRIGENDA

________________________

The following corrections have been made to the Judgment dated 13 November 2012:-

1.   Paragraph 4.5) should read as follow:

4.5) The Wife now appeals and the Husband and the Intervener cross appeal against the judgment (CACV 166/2011). The Husband and the Intervener also lodged appeals against a decision of Saunders J on the costs of the Wife’s application for mareva injunction after trial (CACV 251/2011 and CACV 252/2011).

2.  Paragraphs 42.2) and 42.3):

The word ‘cross’ should appear before the word ‘appeal’ in paragraphs 42.2) and 42.3).

Date this 8th day of March, 2013

  (Candy Lau)(Ms)
  Clerk to the Hon Cheung JA
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment