Read the full judgment text of CACC 225/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 November 2013.
1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against a sentence of 8 months’ imprisonment, and the order that it be served consecutively to a sentence of 14 months’ imprisonment the applicant was then serving, which was imposed upon him on 14 June 2013 by District Court Judge J Lam following his conviction on his plea of guilty of the offence of theft, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. The applicant was acquitted by the judge after trial of Charge 1 on the charge sheet, namely at
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case