Read the full judgment text of CACC 603/1996 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 November 2013.
1. D3承認一項無合理因由而沒有按照法庭的指定歸押（控罪4）；經審訊後，他被裁定一項盜竊罪罪名成立。至於他面對的另外2項控罪，即串謀入屋犯法罪（控罪1）和盜竊罪（控罪3），則被裁定罪名不成立。
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 1 case