MDB v BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW)
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 18/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 March 2014.
1. The applicant is a Nepali national.
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 2 cases
Case No.HCAL 18/2012
Court
High Court CFI
Date21 Mar 2014
PartiesMDB v BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW)
MDB v BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW) [HCAL 18/2012] | BabelCite