MDB v BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW)
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 21 March 2014.
1. Paragraph 21 and 22 at page 6 should read as follows:-
Cites 1 case
Case No.
Court
Date21 Mar 2014
PartiesMDB v BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW)
MDB v BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW) [] | BabelCite