Mdb v. Betty Kwan

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 21 March 2014.

1. Paragraph 21 and 22 at page 6 should read as follows:-

Cites 1 case

Case No.
Court
Date21 Mar 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 18 of 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 18 OF 2012

------------------------

BETWEEN

MDB Applicant
and
BETTY KWAN (AN ADJUDICATOR APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT’S PETITION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 UNCAT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 48(13) OF THE BASIC LAW) Respondent
and
DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Interested Party

------------------------

Before : Hon Au J in Court
Dates of Hearing : 29 & 30 April 2013
Date of Judgment : 21 March 2014

------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

------------------------

1.Paragraph 21 and 22 at page 6 should read as follows:-

“21. On 7 November 2006, the applicant was released on his own recognisance. On 21 November 2006, a removal order was served on him. He had appealed against that order.

22. On 22 November 2006, he became an over-stayer and his CAT claim was formally recognised by the Director.  He was then released on recognisance on 5 January 2007.”

2.Paragraph 29 at page 7 should read as follows:-

“29. There was a hearing of the petition on 25 January 2012 2011.”

  (C.F. TAM)
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Au
  High Court
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment